LogFAQs > #891169025

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Help CE - - Net Neutrality
CableZL 11/27/17 8:14:01 PM #8:	TheRealDill2000 posted... CableZL posted... ISPs wouldn't be looking to place priority on certain types of traffic. They'd be looking to throttle back certain kinds of traffic or block certain services altogether. In the past, a few ISPs were known to slow down Netflix traffic. There is also an ISP that blocked VoIP services so that their customers would be forced to buy POTS lines from them. I'm looking for the potential benefits of the change, not the toxic and unlikely worst case scenarios. How are they unlikely worst case scenarios when ISPs did this in the past until the FCC told them to stop or until Netflix paid them off? --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:891169025] in Help CE - ... [t:76037518]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheRealDill2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>ISPs wouldn't be looking to place priority on certain types of traffic. They'd be looking to throttle back certain kinds of traffic or block certain services altogether. In the past, a few ISPs were known to slow down Netflix traffic. There is also an ISP that blocked VoIP services so that their customers would be forced to buy POTS lines from them.</quote> I'm looking for the potential benefits of the change, not the toxic and unlikely worst case scenarios.</quote> How are they unlikely worst case scenarios when ISPs did this in the past until the FCC told them to stop or until Netflix paid them off? --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1