LogFAQs > #891226097

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The latest version of Firefox uses 30% less memory. Chrome still uses less.
Paragon21XX 11/28/17 5:44:05 PM #16:	Corrupt_Power posted... armandro posted... Paragon21XX posted... Unless you are using a potato, why does memory usage matter? I used 4GB of RAM for 8 years. Never had a problem with FireFox. I don't know what people are doing. Try running it alongside Android Studio and an Android Emulator. You'll cap out 4GB pretty quick - I do regularly. 4GB gets eaten up pretty quick nowadays, and a lot of people still only have that much RAM. This is partly due to the fact that a lot of developers have the same mentality, which is lazy. So... don't own a fucking potato if you are often doing other tasks that take up a significant amount of memory. And going by the chart you have posted, the true difference between browsers is inconsequential. --- Hmm... <cite>Paragon21XX posted [p:891226097] in The latest... [t:76040781]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrupt_Power posted...</cite> <quote><cite>armandro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>Unless you are using a potato, why does memory usage matter?</quote> I used 4GB of RAM for 8 years. Never had a problem with FireFox. I don't know what people are doing.</quote> Try running it alongside Android Studio and an Android Emulator. You'll cap out 4GB pretty quick - I do regularly. 4GB gets eaten up pretty quick nowadays, and a lot of people still only have that much RAM. This is partly due to the fact that a lot of developers have the same mentality, which is lazy.</quote> So... don't own a fucking potato if you are often doing other tasks that take up a significant amount of memory. And going by the chart you have posted, the true difference between browsers is inconsequential. --- Hmm...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1