LogFAQs > #891737397

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDo you agree with Anita Sarkeesian?
Esrac
12/07/17 1:40:25 AM
#30:


Darmik posted...
SusanGreenEyes posted...
It's fine in theory, but she believes games she doesn't hold up to her standards should be modified or not sold.


Where was that ever said?


The closest I am aware of is some article on Kotaku about a list of changes she'd like to see made to games in general. From 2015.

Don't design such sexy female characters, don't include scenes of violence against female characters in which they are treated as helpless, design female characters to be less traditionally feminine, half of playable characters (preferably more) should be female, change how female characters are animated, change how female characters sound in combat (some nonsense about orgasmic grunts), don't include sexualized elements with violence, etc.

Beyond that, it's mostly implied by talking about games having a problem (I think pernicious is the word she used) with the depiction of women. And activists don't tend to talk about problems they don't want fixed. That isn't the same as "games that I don't like shouldn't be sold", but I do get a "games shouldn't include content we think is problematic" vibe from her.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1