LogFAQs > #891890302

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Aren't you happy that you're a liberal Democrat?
nicklebro 12/09/17 1:53:59 PM #37:	averagejoel posted... He appears not to have read it, because he somehow interpreted that as an infringement on his free speech. I don't remember his exact words, but it was something along the lines of "they're forcing us to use their language", which is objectively false and has nothing to do with the bill Lol remember when I asked for substance? You're just claiming he's wrong and that I should take your word for it. And of you actually had a up what you were talking about, you'd know that Peterson is arguing this could lead to compelled speech because the legislation is so poorly constructed. Not to mention it's already a lawn in new York. Google it. But this is all irrelevant to your initial claims anyways. JP is a psychologist, not a lawyer, which is why he said he was worried about this being the eventual outcome. Oh and the lawyers at UofT agreed with him and sent him two letters demanding he stop saying that he won't use made up pronouns. averagejoel posted... His point about free speech as a concept would also carry a lot more weight if he had actually faced any consequences for his speech. But he didn't - he is still employed by University of Toronto, still spouts his ignorant drivel, and is making a ton of money via Patreon because of it. You obviously have never been to his patreon page since it has nothing to do with the nonsense you're bringing up, but thats what happens when you blah about things you don't have a clue about. Anyways, if bill c 16 does in fact end up forcing compelled speech, then it will have effectively infringed on his free speech. Which Canada doesnt guarantee it's citizens. And why would he have been fired? He hasn't broken any laws yet, tho they did send him those two letters I already mentioned. See Are you ever going to actually start backing up any of the bullshit you spouted earlier? All you've said so far is that his initial concerns haven't fully manifested themselves yet, and again, he's not lawyer, he was a professor who voiced some concerns and was then attacked by a bunch of ignorant SJWs like you. Where exactly am I supposed to find fault with his words? averagejoel posted... Second, on transgender issues: sex is more complicated than Male/Female, and it's disingenuous and ignorant to pretend otherwise. There's plenty of information here about that: https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943 What's your point? He said he's not going to use made up pronouns...lol he never claimed trans people don't exist... Soaveragejoel posted... Gender is even more complicated than Sex, and he clearly does not understand this. LMAO I knew it, you truly do have absolutely nonclue what Peterson's stance on transgender people is, let alone anything he's actually said! Lol I could smell the ignorance.on you from a mile away. Peterson has forgotten more about gender than you will ever know in your sad little life. You literally think you know more About the differences in gender than Peterson does? Lol this totally proves that you didn't even listen to what he had to say and the formed your own opinion, you got some bad info from some other morning and are now treating it as gospel lol. How embarrassing. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:891890302] in Aren't you... [t:76077525]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote> He appears not to have read it, because he somehow interpreted that as an infringement on his free speech. I don't remember his exact words, but it was something along the lines of "they're forcing us to use their language", which is objectively false and has nothing to do with the bill</quote> Lol remember when I asked for substance? You're just claiming he's wrong and that I should take your word for it. And of you actually had a up what you were talking about, you'd know that Peterson is arguing this could lead to compelled speech because the legislation is so poorly constructed. Not to mention it's already a lawn in new York. Google it. But this is all irrelevant to your initial claims anyways. JP is a psychologist, not a lawyer, which is why he said he was worried about this being the eventual outcome. Oh and the lawyers at UofT agreed with him and sent him two letters demanding he stop saying that he won't use made up pronouns. <cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote> His point about free speech as a concept would also carry a lot more weight if he had actually faced any consequences for his speech. But he didn't - he is still employed by University of Toronto, still spouts his ignorant drivel, and is making a ton of money via Patreon because of it.</quote> You obviously have never been to his patreon page since it has nothing to do with the nonsense you're bringing up, but thats what happens when you blah about things you don't have a clue about. Anyways, if bill c 16 does in fact end up forcing compelled speech, then it will have effectively infringed on his free speech. Which Canada doesnt guarantee it's citizens. And why would he have been fired? He hasn't broken any laws yet, tho they did send him those two letters I already mentioned. See Are you ever going to actually start backing up any of the bullshit you spouted earlier? All you've said so far is that his initial concerns haven't fully manifested themselves yet, and again, he's not lawyer, he was a professor who voiced some concerns and was then attacked by a bunch of ignorant SJWs like you. Where exactly am I supposed to find fault with his words? <cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote> Second, on transgender issues: sex is more complicated than Male/Female, and it's disingenuous and ignorant to pretend otherwise. There's plenty of information here about that: https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943</quote> What's your point? He said he's not going to use made up pronouns...lol he never claimed trans people don't exist... So<cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote> Gender is even more complicated than Sex, and he clearly does not understand this.</quote> LMAO I knew it, you truly do have absolutely nonclue what Peterson's stance on transgender people is, let alone anything he's actually said! Lol I could smell the ignorance.on you from a mile away. Peterson has forgotten more about gender than you will ever know in your sad little life. You literally think you know more About the differences in gender than Peterson does? Lol this totally proves that you didn't even listen to what he had to say and the formed your own opinion, you got some bad info from some other morning and are now treating it as gospel lol. How embarrassing. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1