LogFAQs > #891890895

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Aren't you happy that you're a liberal Democrat?
averagejoel 12/09/17 2:05:09 PM #39:	nicklebro posted... Lol remember when I asked for substance? You're just claiming he's wrong and that I should take your word for it. And of you actually had a up what you were talking about, you'd know that Peterson is arguing this could lead to compelled speech because the legislation is so poorly constructed. Not to mention it's already a lawn in new York. Google it. But this is all irrelevant to your initial claims anyways. JP is a psychologist, not a lawyer, which is why he said he was worried about this being the eventual outcome. Oh and the lawyers at UofT agreed with him and sent him two letters demanding he stop saying that he won't use made up pronouns. would you like some vinaigrette for that word salad? nicklebro posted... You obviously have never been to his patreon page since it has nothing to do with the nonsense you're bringing up, but thats what happens when you blah about things you don't have a clue about. I made no claims about the content of his patreon. I said that his patreon is successful because of his fame, which is a direct result of his refusal to use gender-neutral pronouns. Anyways, if bill c 16 does in fact end up forcing compelled speech, then it will have effectively infringed on his free speech. then it's a good thing that there's no valid indication that it will, and any attempts to say otherwise have been nothing more than transphobic fear-mongering And why would he have been fired? He hasn't broken any laws yet, tho they did send him those two letters I already mentioned. See I said that his point about free speech might have held some water if he had faced any consequences. Which he hasn't. Are you ever going to actually start backing up any of the bullshit you spouted earlier? All you've said so far is that his initial concerns haven't fully manifested themselves yet, and again, he's not lawyer, he was a professor who voiced some concerns and was then attacked by a bunch of ignorant SJWs like you. Where exactly am I supposed to find fault with his words? a second helping of word salad --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:891890895] in Aren't you... [t:76077525]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote>Lol remember when I asked for substance? You're just claiming he's wrong and that I should take your word for it. And of you actually had a up what you were talking about, you'd know that Peterson is arguing this could lead to compelled speech because the legislation is so poorly constructed. Not to mention it's already a lawn in new York. Google it. But this is all irrelevant to your initial claims anyways. JP is a psychologist, not a lawyer, which is why he said he was worried about this being the eventual outcome. Oh and the lawyers at UofT agreed with him and sent him two letters demanding he stop saying that he won't use made up pronouns. </quote> would you like some vinaigrette for that word salad? <cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote>You obviously have never been to his patreon page since it has nothing to do with the nonsense you're bringing up, but thats what happens when you blah about things you don't have a clue about. </quote> I made no claims about the content of his patreon. I said that his patreon is successful because of his fame, which is a direct result of his refusal to use gender-neutral pronouns. <quote>Anyways, if bill c 16 does in fact end up forcing compelled speech, then it will have effectively infringed on his free speech.</quote> then it's a good thing that there's no valid indication that it will, and any attempts to say otherwise have been nothing more than transphobic fear-mongering <quote>And why would he have been fired? He hasn't broken any laws yet, tho they did send him those two letters I already mentioned. See</quote> I said that his point about free speech might have held some water if he had faced any consequences. Which he hasn't. <quote>Are you ever going to actually start backing up any of the bullshit you spouted earlier? All you've said so far is that his initial concerns haven't fully manifested themselves yet, and again, he's not lawyer, he was a professor who voiced some concerns and was then attacked by a bunch of ignorant SJWs like you. Where exactly am I supposed to find fault with his words?</quote> a second helping of word salad --- peanut butter and dick</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1