LogFAQs > #891906829

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicShould abortion and birth control be subsidized by the government?
darkjedilink
12/09/17 7:08:02 PM
#48:


Webmaster4531 posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Darklit_Minuet posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
What churches do is irrelevant to the fact that PP's services nonetheless extend far beyond abortion.

And that's irrelevant to the fact that, since government funds cannot be used for abortion, and everything else can be 100% funded by private donation, they don't need government funding in any way.

Doesn't mean if they don't "need" it or not, it should still have it

No, they shouldn't. PP has no right to steal other people's property at gunpoint.

God this is astronomically stupid. You one of those taxes = theft people?

If it's so stupid, why does PP have so much more of a right to my property than I do that they can take it at gunpoint, when all their services save one are offered elsewhere without such?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1