LogFAQs > #892626379

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSurvivor: Heroes/Healers/Hustlers Discussion Topic 5: Spoiler-free finale
KujikawaRising
12/21/17 11:14:33 AM
#418:


StormTR posted...
Mike and Ben were worse than all of them because in Mike's case he needed ALL of those Immunities or he'd be voted out and essentially WAS voted out at Final 7 and was only saved by an Idol he found. Anybody who only makes it through a round thanks to an Idol, screwed up majorly and is somebody I could never give my vote to.

Idols art part of the game. Period, end of story. If someone plays one and plays it well, then they're doing something right and outmaneuvering the people trying to get rid of them. Many winners have utilized idols to maximum effect, including Mike, who got out the only person that had beaten him in an immunity before Mama C did that round. I'd say that improves his strategic stock, not the reverse. If you MISplay an idol, that's not a good look.

What you're saying is basically you'd never award someone who found an idol a million dollar vote. That's not how Survivor works. Idols are one factor. To exclude anybody that played an idol and used it to blindside somebody else means you're a bitter juror.

Peridiam posted...
Yeah, I'd say Chrissy had the best FTC.

This.

Also, Natalie White is not that bad. She was socially aware and was a good complement to the strategist sitting next to her. She only beat him because he was a total asshole to the jury, meaning they didn't like nor respect him. Amber is below Ben.
---
http://i.imgur.com/t3naEGu.jpg
I'm BlueCrystalTear, probably at work.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1