LogFAQs > #893085698

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Rwanda aims to be 'smart nation' says they must combat 0 resources with science.
Funkdamental 12/29/17 6:23:57 PM #23:	boxington posted... An August 13, 2008 amendment to the Rwandan constitution specifically added the words "against the Tutsi" after the word "genocide" in Article 51; it might be said this put an official stamp on a narrative of the genocide that framed it solely in terms of Tutsi victimhood. tbf, Tutsi were killed due to their ethnicity, while Hutu were killed for their "moderate" views I understand that. But it would seem like an unnecessary amendment to make. The Batwa people of Rwanda lost roughly a third of their entire population during the genocide, and there's little or no official recognition of it; refining the wording of the constitution in this way to put sole emphasis on Tutsi suffering is unhelpful. --- Slaughterhouse 5 Cattle 0 <cite>Funkdamental posted [p:893085698] in Rwanda aim... [t:76138504]...</cite> <quote><cite>boxington posted...</cite> <quote><quote>An August 13, 2008 amendment to the Rwandan constitution specifically added the words "against the Tutsi" after the word "genocide" in Article 51; it might be said this put an official stamp on a narrative of the genocide that framed it solely in terms of Tutsi victimhood.</quote> tbf, Tutsi were killed due to their ethnicity, while Hutu were killed for their "moderate" views</quote> I understand that. But it would seem like an unnecessary amendment to make. The Batwa people of Rwanda lost roughly a third of their entire population during the genocide, and there's little or no official recognition of it; refining the wording of the constitution in this way to put sole emphasis on Tutsi suffering is unhelpful. --- Slaughterhouse 5 Cattle 0</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1