LogFAQs > #893122857

Caution999 posted...

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/8-highly-inconvenient-facts-for-al-gore-10-years-after-his-infamous-movie

I'm not sure why you're referencing a film made by a politician & activist rather than referencing the actual scientific material. You're presenting a scientific debate through two lenses

1: The lens of Al Gore, who has made a number of dubious statements on the subject in the past, who is not a climatologist.

2: TheBlaze, a highly conservative network with a political bias against the subject ran by a guy who is certifiably insane (Glenn Beck.)

The website itself makes a number of bizarre claims on the face of it while presenting itself in an incredibly biased manner;

-Claiming the sun might be behind the current set of changes despite solar activity progressively trending downwards for decades.
-Using short scale 2015 data from the arctic to say it's "re-freezing" without looking at the last several decades.

Generally, the sourcing in the article is pretty bad, and a lot of things are directed more at Gore & his arguments, but it clearly falters when it comes to talking about climate change itself.
---

Enjoy movies and television? Check out my blog! I do reviews and analyses.
http://fictionrantreview.wordpress.com/ (The Force Awakens spoiler review up!)