LogFAQs > #894413640

WastelandCowboy posted...

My thought process works in the sense that I don't disregard a person's opinions just because I don't agree and/or know one or more of their opinions aren't true.

That's still apples to oranges, though. I'm specifically talking about if an individual lies about a specific issue in regards to one whether you would trust them when they're making that exact same claim against somebody else. Because most people would be far less likely to believe it. It's a bit different about lying about one thing then alleging a claim of a completely different sort although, admittedly, if somebody fabricates things on a consistent basis, it does raise questions about their overall trustworthiness.

WastelandCowboy posted...

You can keep your "respect" for me. I don't want it. I don't give a shit what you think of me.

Like I said, I don't begrudge you how you may feel about me. Because, unlike a good many people here and elsewhere, my like or dislike for individuals isn't based on a narcissistic reciprocation or, for that matter, shared ideology.

WastelandCowboy posted...

And you're wrong. That vacuum was filled by Duckbear - not Foxx.

Except it's really not. Duckbear has been doing Duckbear stuff all along and that has hardly been the bulk of his posting.

WastelandCowboy posted...

Unlike you, she doesn't talk shit about other people behind their back.

lolwut? First, this isn't talking behind her back. Second, if you're going to claim that she doesn't badmouth me in the third-person, you're either inactive or being purposefully oblivious. More importantly, nothing that I've said here isn't anything I haven't already said directly to her. (Besides, perhaps, the news that I hold her in some esteem; however, I'm sure she'd publicly demur any such praise from me.)
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.