LogFAQs > #894723293

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why is nobody talking about the FBI actively colluding to fight Donald Trump?
legendary_zell 01/24/18 4:47:06 PM #48:	s0nicfan posted... Doom_Art posted... I love how angry Trumpers get at the (justified) lack of reaction to these stories stomps feet "WHY IS NO ONE TAKING THIS SERIOUSLY REEEEE" The biggest story of the past year has been the investigation into the possibility that trump colluded with russia to rig the election. It's been nearly 24/7 coverage of it. We're being told its the watergate of our time, and one of the most important events in modern politics. Now we have hard evidence that someone relatively high in the FBI actively tried to rig the election and may have had help, and we're being told this is a "nothingburger" I'm sure you'd understand why some people would take issue with the hypocrisy. I also understand why people who hate trump would shrug it off. "No bad tactics, only bad targets" after all. Where is the evidence that anything was done? Even if something was done, it wouldn't constitute rigging. I don't see how a few agents could possibly rig an election. I don't think anyone is saying what you are attributing to "liberals". If FBI agents really attempted to influence the election, that's bad and should be investigated and punished, I don't think you'll find liberals attempting to taint or shut down a legit investigation like the right is with Mueller. You're not gonna have the NYT saying the prosecutor should be fired like the WSJ did with Russia. It's also markedly worse when a candidate is the one conspiring any with a foreign country in a way that harms our national security and faith in democracy. There's no same thing both sides here and there is no equivalency. The level of proof that something truly unethical or illegal was done is also not equivalent. --- http://i.imgur.com/0Bi86cp.gif <cite>legendary_zell posted [p:894723293] in Why is nob... [t:76233795]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>I love how angry Trumpers get at the (justified) lack of reaction to these stories stomps feet "WHY IS NO ONE TAKING THIS SERIOUSLY REEEEE"</quote> The biggest story of the past year has been the investigation into the possibility that trump colluded with russia to rig the election. It's been nearly 24/7 coverage of it. We're being told its the watergate of our time, and one of the most important events in modern politics. Now we have hard evidence that someone relatively high in the FBI actively tried to rig the election and may have had help, and we're being told this is a "nothingburger" I'm sure you'd understand why some people would take issue with the hypocrisy. I also understand why people who hate trump would shrug it off. "No bad tactics, only bad targets" after all.</quote> Where is the evidence that anything was done? Even if something was done, it wouldn't constitute rigging. I don't see how a few agents could possibly rig an election. I don't think anyone is saying what you are attributing to "liberals". If FBI agents really attempted to influence the election, that's bad and should be investigated and punished, I don't think you'll find liberals attempting to taint or shut down a legit investigation like the right is with Mueller. You're not gonna have the NYT saying the prosecutor should be fired like the WSJ did with Russia. It's also markedly worse when a candidate is the one conspiring any with a foreign country in a way that harms our national security and faith in democracy. There's no same thing both sides here and there is no equivalency. The level of proof that something truly unethical or illegal was done is also not equivalent. --- http://i.imgur.com/0Bi86cp.gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1