LogFAQs > #895060756

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI hope you're happy, PotD!
Zeus
01/29/18 6:34:22 PM
#7:


Nomak-54 posted...
Why'd he leave? Did it have something to do with that tinder topic o:


It was the beginning of the end.

shadowsword87 posted...
Zikten posted...
he didn't look bad


I've asked this before, and I'll ask it again:
How the hell would a bunch of straight guys know what women are interested in?

I'm not being insulting, but I really don't know what you're going off of.


That's a facetious argument, though. By that same token you could criticize the expertise of women here particularly because, as RC pointed out quite a few times lately, the women here aren't qualified to speak for all women.

However, all that aside, even babies can tell attractive faces from unattractive ones.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-small-talk/201112/the-magic-spell-pretty-face

There'a certain baseline attractiveness which people recognize independent of gender or sexual orientation. Even if you put that aside, most of us have been alive long enough to get a good idea of what women might find attractive just from empirical observation of seeing women with men. More importantly, the issue he was having wasn't a matter of not getting a response -- meaning that he was completely unattractive -- but instead getting blown off (well, figuratively -- if he was actually getting blown, he wouldn't make a topic complaining about it)
---
(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1