LogFAQs > #895229659

InYourWalls1 posted...

Okay I see where you're coming from. I guess that's where my interpretation differs

Your interpretation suggests you don't understand there is an established accepted definition of vegan. You are confusing ethics of animal treatment with this.

InYourWalls1 posted...

Of course when it comes to taking their eggs it's not to their benefit, but provided a chicken is well cared for, not to their detriment either, so no harm no fowl

I don't exactly disagree. But eggs are not vegan No one will argue against the statement an egg is an animal product.

It's important to know that because when things are labeled vegan on food or restaurants that must mean zero animal products. Don't want to muddy the accepted definition. It's not about the ethics when vegan is an adjective, it's about the total absence of animal products. That includes a vegan diet or vegan clothing or vegan cosmetics or vegan lifestyle. You can't just add animal products to something and call it vegan just because of how the items were sourced and how you feel about it. That's irrelevant.
---

Never write off the Doctor!