LogFAQs > #896043194

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAFL clears transgender footballer to play in state women's league.
BADoglick
02/13/18 11:01:07 PM
#35:


shadowsword87 posted...
BADoglick posted...
Your ignorance is astounding


Would you like to actually respond to my response, or just make bland vaguely insulting blanket statements?


1. If you open the door to transgendered men, you close the door on women. Men have their own professional league. Women have their own. If you can't understand why they're seperate, then I'm not going to bother spending all night explaining it to you. If you can't understand that women are losing employment opportunities for the sake of including men in a women's football league, then I'm not going to spend all night explaining that either.

2. First, there's more than eleven players on a football team. NFL teams typically carry 53. Which I admit would seemingly strengthen your argument, but in actuality, it doesn't, because there's thousands of girls who try out every year that don't make it even despite the higher number of players. All your second point does, is illustrate that you know nothing about football. Which brings me to your third point...

3. Yes, it's football. It's dangerous. That doesn't mean that you compound the danger for the sake of appeasing the trans community. Men are built differently than women, that's a fact. If a 240 lb man tackles a 160 lb woman at full force, they could easily die. I don't understand how thick you have to be to not grasp this concept.
---
BADoglick to the Max!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1