LogFAQs > #896177469

Zangulus posted...

Zeus posted...

Given the age, there's not much he could have done. If you really care, there might be a record of the case you could look into.

So, you're saying you don't know fuck all about what he could have done (and yes, children have been fucked to death, by literal penetration)... so saying there's not much he could have done is a complete load of shit...

And I don't care if he doesn't have *Much* access to children. Any is too damned much for a BABY FUCKER.

Given that she lived, it's pretty clear he didn't do that. And you don't know fuck all about what he actually did either, so I'm not sure why you're playing a heavy hand here.

And, again, your outrage is a backhanded criticism of the entire idea of criminal reform, which is an ultra-conservative stance that would make even Ted Cruz blush. By the logic you're espousing, thieves shouldn't be allowed near other peoples' possessions and murderers should never be around another human being. It's a ridiculous standard.

Moonjay posted...

He resigned anyway because of the justified outrage. Shunned.

Justified? Justified how, exactly? He served his time, disclosed his crime, and was in a position where he was benefiting society. If he was good at his job -- which he likely was, given that he was put in that position -- it's ludicrous to double jeopardy him for a crime where he already paid his dues.

Zangulus posted...

Lokarin posted...

So you would have him executed/life sentence, fair enough - but that's not the delegated punishment

I don't care. The failure of the system does not require my acceptance of BABY FUCKER.

What failure, exactly? That the justice system in a developed nation doesn't act like a third-world nation that stones people to death for their transgressions?
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.