LogFAQs > #896482371

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	We've reached the "crisis actors" stage of the response
Dash_Harber 02/21/18 4:26:26 AM #86:	hockeybub89 posted... r4X0r posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Hey guys theres an active shooter roaming the building, so Im gonna talk loudly and interview people while hiding. Sounds like a good idea right? Literally the rights line of thinking. Uhh. What the right wants is for people to be able to say "Holy shit there's an active shooter in the building, let me draw the legal firearm that I have spent dozens of hours training to operate, and let me find the active shooter and kill them." Law abiding gun owners kill the mass shooter. Why do gun grabbers want to see more dead kids?? We can't even always trust police officers to stay calm and discharge their firearm properly, but we're supposed to trust a bunch of armed civilians to stay calm, identify the correct target, and play hero? A police officer fucks up and the argument is "They're only humans. This ain't the movies." But civilians? They're motherfucking John Wick. This is what it boils down to. I don't believe owning or carrying a firearm requires you to spend 'dozens of hours training' to own. As well, nearly every incident with armed civilians ended up making the situation more difficult. If you already don't trust random people on the street to make good logical decisions, what do you think is going to happen if you hand them a gun and tell them to shoot the bad guy? <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:896482371] in We've reac... [t:76340028]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>r4X0r posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Hey guys theres an active shooter roaming the building, so Im gonna talk loudly and interview people while hiding. Sounds like a good idea right? Literally the rights line of thinking.</quote> Uhh. What the right wants is for people to be able to say "Holy shit there's an active shooter in the building, let me draw the legal firearm that I have spent dozens of hours training to operate, and let me find the active shooter and kill them." Law abiding gun owners kill the mass shooter. Why do gun grabbers want to see more dead kids??</quote> We can't even always trust police officers to stay calm and discharge their firearm properly, but we're supposed to trust a bunch of armed civilians to stay calm, identify the correct target, and play hero? A police officer fucks up and the argument is "They're only humans. This ain't the movies." But civilians? They're motherfucking John Wick.</quote> This is what it boils down to. I don't believe owning or carrying a firearm requires you to spend 'dozens of hours training' to own. As well, nearly every incident with armed civilians ended up making the situation more difficult. If you already don't trust random people on the street to make good logical decisions, what do you think is going to happen if you hand them a gun and tell them to shoot the bad guy?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1