LogFAQs > #896492684

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Hooker U forced to vacate 2013 "Title"
FinalistCloud 02/21/18 10:43:55 AM #24:	Nelson_Mandela posted... FinalistCloud posted... Nelson_Mandela posted... How exactly does giving some athletes prostitutes negate their play on the court? They wouldn't have gotten them without them... They are ineligible because of recruiting violations. Do you really think those players would have chosen another team if they didn't buy them strippers? I'm not disagreeing, just playing devil's advocate. UCLA and other teams have been accused of way worse and never had to vacate anything. Some of them went there cause of free prostitutes... yes. And the thing about the NCAA is that it doesn't matter if it succeeds, the fact they were recruited using impermissible benefits is what makes them ineligible. <cite>FinalistCloud posted [p:896492684] in Hooker U f... [t:76339472]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FinalistCloud posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>How exactly does giving some athletes prostitutes negate their play on the court?</quote> They wouldn't have gotten them without them... They are ineligible because of recruiting violations.</quote> Do you really think those players would have chosen another team if they didn't buy them strippers? I'm not disagreeing, just playing devil's advocate. UCLA and other teams have been accused of way worse and never had to vacate anything.</quote> Some of them went there cause of free prostitutes... yes. And the thing about the NCAA is that it doesn't matter if it succeeds, the fact they were recruited using impermissible benefits is what makes them ineligible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1