LogFAQs > #896765308

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	At what point is it reasonable for the Constitution to be re-evaluated???
Doctor Foxx 02/25/18 9:03:13 PM #24:	TheWorstPoster posted... Doctor Foxx posted... The right to bear arms was a modification to the Constitution by way of being an amendment. Repeal or revise it First of all, the Second Amendment does NOT grant anyone the right to bear arms. It forbids the role of government from infringing on the rights of the people to bear arms. Want to repeal it? Prepare for a more larger government, who would use that as a precedent, where they would then proceed to repeal or revise the First Amendment, and criminalizing "hate speech" (in which they would define). So doesn't that make firearm ownership restrictions of any kind unconstitutional? Such as not allowing felons or people with mental illness or minors to purchase guns, due to lawmakers --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:896765308] in At what po... [t:76354410]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheWorstPoster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote>The right to bear arms was a modification to the Constitution by way of being an amendment. Repeal or revise it</quote> First of all, the Second Amendment does NOT grant anyone the right to bear arms. It forbids the role of government from infringing on the rights of the people to bear arms. Want to repeal it? Prepare for a more larger government, who would use that as a precedent, where they would then proceed to repeal or revise the First Amendment, and criminalizing "hate speech" (in which they would define).</quote> So doesn't that make firearm ownership restrictions of any kind unconstitutional? Such as not allowing felons or people with mental illness or minors to purchase guns, due to lawmakers --- Never write off the Doctor!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1