LogFAQs > #896971301

To recap what I said in the other topic:

The one clip I googled mentions taking the guns then giving due process (ie, the same thing that RC posted), which sounds like the gun equivalent of an involuntary psychiatric hold -- ie, immediate response then resolution. In that context, it doesn't sound entirely unreasonable at face value although I'm still not sure if it'd be a violation of civil liberties given the existent difficulties concerning civil forfeiture (an egregious practice which should be curtailed or outlawed).

As such, it's not a matter of "just taking everybody's guns" but would instead likely resemble an established process.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.