LogFAQs > #897291439

Vulgorn posted...

Your point is if you're asked to do it.

I think most of us advocating for it here would just do it because we want to.

Which isn't subservient.

The implication of the topic title and the OP is that TC does not enjoy it, but does it anyways. Thus making him subservient when he does it.

I do think TC is the anomaly in not enjoying going down on someone, hence his calling it a "chore." But he does it anyways. If you were assigned something that you did not actively want to do, but do anyways, are you not inherently submitting to that person by fulfilling their request?

Doctor Foxx posted...

MuffinzwOrned posted...

What if the wife goes and tells the husband to mow the lawn while she watches TV? Even though the husband is "in control," he's still subservient.

That's not an act between two people that's delegation of tasks and yeah those that delegate are in charge

And the dominant person delegates the pleasure giving. Sometimes it's them sometimes it's not

You're digging too deep again.

On the surface, a guy mowing the lawn while his wife watches TV is being submissive. On the surface. Things only change when you start digging into things like "motivation," or "commands," or whatever. For example, we can go down the rabbit hole of "he's mowing the lawn because he wants to." In that case, he's dominant. As is the case with going down on someone as well; if I want to go down on my wife, I'm being dominant by doing it because I want to. However, this is all digging beneath the surface of my point.

When you start the hypotheticals of "why" someone goes down on someone, or "why" someone mows the lawn, that's too deep.

A woman sucking a dude's dick while he lies there and relaxes is submissive. That's the surface. Once you start digging the hole of "No she's being dominant because she wants to, then you're digging too deep.
---

Your signature is automatically appended to the bottom of every post you make.