No I'm saying another than an apprentice killing the master literally the entire context was different
This is just nonsense.
They took the base scene in Return of the Jedi and reconstructed it for repurpose. The contextual characters are the same, the set-up is the same, the setting is the same, the climax is the same.
I'm not saying it has the same meaning in the new movie as it did in Return of the Jedi or that "teh sikniphikanse 4 teh tynelime" is the same. That's weirdly specifik and not a criteria I've ever heard used before in determining whether something is unoriginal (it's totally different because it has a unique significance for the timeline!").
My point was simply that taking a scene and repurposing it from the next movie rather than the one everyone was expecting you to to copy from is reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally not that impressive or bold or whatever people like to claim it is.
Hey you know what would be cool? Original scenes that has the same symbolic meaning as just taking old scenes and giving them new significance for the timeline.
It took the basic premise of the scene and changed literally everything about it to completely subvert the expectation of where things were headed. That is original enough considering no one anticipated it.