Pretending that toxic masculinity isn't a core tenet of feminism is not a convincing tactic.
So if you had a son and a daughter and they were playing with your daughters dolls, do think it's perfectly fine to tell your son to stop playing with dolls because they are for girls or do you think its inconsequential that he plays with them and that it's more important that they are developing a bond together? Which one of those scenarios is a feminist agenda in your mind, if either?
There's no point in trying to reason with him. The concept has already been explained in a crystal clear manner several times in this topic. He is not engaging in good faith, he's so focused on being anti-feminazi that he can't or wont see reason and won't stop associating the term with his idea of radical feminism. The word triggers him.
Again, the irony is very rich here considering that a lot of the points I've brought up over the course of the topic are either glossed over, arbitrarily disregarded, or hell even ignored. ---