LogFAQs > #902483732

Jen0125 posted...

I'm not. It's Asian sizing. The size chart they had had height listed too, I'm assuming for pants, and the tallest height for XL was only 5'5.

That's why the OP said the same measurements were used for both and one was a medium and one was an XL. Keep up.

I Was being sarcy to be fair, i did think about making note in my post about how you stated they were the same measurements but classed as different sizes but figured it was fairly obvious i wasn't being serious, guess thats my bad as its hard to tell when one is being sarcy or not.

On a more related note, i ordered 2 work shirts the other month, one short sleeved and one long, both the same size (apparently) but one was too big and the other too tight, so i had to go down a size in one and up a size in another.