LogFAQs > #902530063

Nichtcrawler X posted...

adjl posted...

That may be, but I'm fine with using blanket regulations instead of having to pick and choose what constitutes necessities.

I'd say getting a cake from a fancy cake-shop constitutes craftsmanship, so I doubt there's an argument there for why it would not be a luxury.

So what if we say that growing vegetables and raising livestock constitutes craftsmanship? Does it then become legal to refuse to sell gay people meat and vegetables?

That really doesn't work as a basis for defining necessities. It's far too open-ended.
---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.