LogFAQs > #902691509

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Microsoft did a lot of good things for consoles
1337toothbrush 06/07/18 12:46:39 AM #21:	Darmik posted... 1337toothbrush posted... Free DLC was rare on the 360. Epic, a major partner, had to beg Microsoft to let them "sponsor" a free map for Gears of War. Microsoft was the publisher for that game though. You made it sound like you were talking about third parties. The same policy applied to third-parties. If they wanted to release free content, it'd be considered a "patch". After the first patch, the developers have to pay a substantial sum. Also, a patch couldn't exceed a certain size (and it was a very restrictive size) in order to fit on the memory card for Xbox 360s that didn't have a hard drive. This restriction didn't exist for paid DLC. --- https://imgur.com/a/FU9H8 https://imgur.com/ZkQRDsR - https://imgur.com/2x2gtgP <cite>1337toothbrush posted [p:902691509] in Microsoft ... [t:76681743]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>1337toothbrush posted...</cite> <quote>Free DLC was rare on the 360. Epic, a major partner, had to beg Microsoft to let them "sponsor" a free map for Gears of War.</quote> Microsoft was the publisher for that game though. You made it sound like you were talking about third parties.</quote> The same policy applied to third-parties. If they wanted to release free content, it'd be considered a "patch". After the first patch, the developers have to pay a substantial sum. Also, a patch couldn't exceed a certain size (and it was a very restrictive size) in order to fit on the memory card for Xbox 360s that didn't have a hard drive. This restriction didn't exist for paid DLC. --- https://imgur.com/a/FU9H8 https://imgur.com/ZkQRDsR - https://imgur.com/2x2gtgP</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1