LogFAQs > #903017198

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Imagine being proud of being such a piece of shit.
McSame_as_Bush 06/11/18 9:46:28 PM #21:	adjl posted... McSame_as_Bush posted... JixHedgehog posted... McSame_as_Bush posted... JixHedgehog posted... Not very progressive but well within his rights Umm no it's not actually. Would he be allowed to refuse to serve blacks? If a baker is allowed to refuse service to a gay couple due to religious conflict then this guy is safe Refusing Blacks is probably next, some loophole in the Constitution I'm sure Yeah buddy that wasn't the ruling. He couldn't be forced to bake a cake that specifically mentioned gay marriage, but he couldn't choose not to bake a cake period just because the customers were gay. It didn't even say that much, that was just his own policy on the matter. That's true. It was a very narrow ruling. The SCOTUS hates making broad rulings, so we'll have to wait years for further clarification most likely. --- wanna ask but I just stare can I run my hands through your car wash hair <cite>McSame_as_Bush posted [p:903017198] in Imagine be... [t:76698105]...</cite> <quote><cite>adjl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McSame_as_Bush posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McSame_as_Bush posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>Not very progressive but well within his rights</quote> Umm no it's not actually. Would he be allowed to refuse to serve blacks?</quote> If a baker is allowed to refuse service to a gay couple due to religious conflict then this guy is safe Refusing Blacks is probably next, some loophole in the Constitution I'm sure</quote> Yeah buddy that wasn't the ruling. He couldn't be forced to bake a cake that specifically mentioned gay marriage, but he couldn't choose not to bake a cake period just because the customers were gay.</quote> It didn't even say that much, that was just his own policy on the matter.</quote> That's true. It was a very narrow ruling. The SCOTUS hates making broad rulings, so we'll have to wait years for further clarification most likely. --- wanna ask but I just stare can I run my hands through your car wash hair</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1