LogFAQs > #903021911

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Microsoft e3 > Sony e3
BlackScythe0 06/11/18 10:22:02 PM #17:	GanglyKhan posted... BlackScythe0 posted... GanglyKhan posted... BlackScythe0 posted... GanglyKhan posted... Agreed. Let's see how Nintendo fares tomorrow. Oh, are they competing again? Low hanging fruit, you can do better than that. I'm actually not sure what you mean. They stopped doing the formal conferences a few years back. Oh, sorry. I thought you were implying that they hadn't released anything good in a while. I'm talking about E3 presence, not necessarily the conference. Nintendo still gets a bad mark from me off the bat for ditching the old format though. If I remember correctly there was one year where all they showed was a Zelda game. That is what I mean by they aren't competing. Like I consider the square presentation trash because of how short it was. It's not impossible for Nintendo to amaze us all but if they follow the general theme of the last few years only the most extreme fan boys will think they won with their limited showing. Dynalo posted... I dunno. Sony had an abysmal start, but the lineup of games was solid. Almost all of them features gameplay pretty extensively. Just needed a few more release dates for me to be happy with it. Overall I'd put them about even for how much I'm looking forward to what was announced. Microsoft had the much better presentation, but I suspect I'll play more of the games on PlayStation I consider this a judgement of the conference, not the console. I'm never going to buy and xbone. I still think they had the best showing easily. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:903021911] in Microsoft ... [t:76699418]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote>Agreed. Let's see how Nintendo fares tomorrow.</quote> Oh, are they competing again?</quote> Low hanging fruit, you can do better than that.</quote> I'm actually not sure what you mean. They stopped doing the formal conferences a few years back.</quote> Oh, sorry. I thought you were implying that they hadn't released anything good in a while. I'm talking about E3 presence, not necessarily the conference. Nintendo still gets a bad mark from me off the bat for ditching the old format though.</quote> If I remember correctly there was one year where all they showed was a Zelda game. That is what I mean by they aren't competing. Like I consider the square presentation trash because of how short it was. It's not impossible for Nintendo to amaze us all but if they follow the general theme of the last few years only the most extreme fan boys will think they won with their limited showing. <cite>Dynalo posted...</cite> <quote>I dunno. Sony had an abysmal start, but the lineup of games was solid. Almost all of them features gameplay pretty extensively. Just needed a few more release dates for me to be happy with it. Overall I'd put them about even for how much I'm looking forward to what was announced. Microsoft had the much better presentation, but I suspect I'll play more of the games on PlayStation</quote> I consider this a judgement of the conference, not the console. I'm never going to buy and xbone. I still think they had the best showing easily.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1