LogFAQs > #903052949

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why is Jim Sterling complaining that it's easier for bad games to get on Steam.
BlackScythe0 06/12/18 9:04:57 AM #40:	yutterh posted... BlackScythe0 posted... The complaint is the people who just get some resources off the internet and throw them into a basically no effort "game" to get a buck from people gullible enough to buy it. It serves to bury potentially good games under shit. But while I can understand the argument I would prefer lower barriers to entry, shit and all. The good games always seems to float up and there are a number of great channels on youtube that sift through the shit to do videos on the promising games. People forget that this exact scenario happened with the atari. Which actually led to a videogame crash. But that was also when videogames were new and people were unsure about them. Now they are part of a way of life, just like any movie or novel. Heck the industry is growing so big that it is actually gonna be overtaking movies. So having a bunch of garbage will do nothing but make people never buy their games again. Nowadays if you screw up a game, your gonna get a ridiculous amount of bad publicity and boycotts. Like I will never buy another game from Gun Media, there handling of Friday the 13th is terrible. I don't think your Atari reference is truly valid. ET wasn't just a random one dollar game from a no name developer on steam. It was a advertised for a super popular movie that they made way too many copies for and developed by atari. Also wasn't really game reviews, not the way we have now to instantly pull things up on our phones. The kind of trash games I'm talking about aren't making it onto consoles. The industry is more mature now and technology allows us to pull up reviews on our phone at anytime for anything we want. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:903052949] in Why is Jim... [t:76697117]...</cite> <quote><cite>yutterh posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>The complaint is the people who just get some resources off the internet and throw them into a basically no effort "game" to get a buck from people gullible enough to buy it. It serves to bury potentially good games under shit. But while I can understand the argument I would prefer lower barriers to entry, shit and all. The good games always seems to float up and there are a number of great channels on youtube that sift through the shit to do videos on the promising games.</quote> People forget that this exact scenario happened with the atari. Which actually led to a videogame crash. But that was also when videogames were new and people were unsure about them. Now they are part of a way of life, just like any movie or novel. Heck the industry is growing so big that it is actually gonna be overtaking movies. So having a bunch of garbage will do nothing but make people never buy their games again. Nowadays if you screw up a game, your gonna get a ridiculous amount of bad publicity and boycotts. Like I will never buy another game from Gun Media, there handling of Friday the 13th is terrible.</quote> I don't think your Atari reference is truly valid. ET wasn't just a random one dollar game from a no name developer on steam. It was a advertised for a super popular movie that they made way too many copies for and developed by atari. Also wasn't really game reviews, not the way we have now to instantly pull things up on our phones. The kind of trash games I'm talking about aren't making it onto consoles. The industry is more mature now and technology allows us to pull up reviews on our phone at anytime for anything we want.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1