LogFAQs > #903284668

Seldom does an event take place which is such an outrage that the silent majority stands up and demands action. But the silent majority is currently demanding that something be done about Muffinz0rz. There are a number of reasons Muffinz0rz isn't telling us as to why he wants to fund a vast web of unreasonable sewer rats, unctuous, sexist punks, and naive, fatuous vendors of Maoism. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that he accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does he believe I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept his claim that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be. Common sense and scientific evidence agree: The point at which you discover that he's the quintessential saturnine politico is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that the really interesting thing about all this is not that his approach is generally to seize upon an anecdote or a narrow and limited manifestation and/or purpose, and then totally blow it out of proportion to justify his vexatious, crass platitudes. The interesting thing is that he says that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. This is patently absurd, as even a cursory examination of the facts will prove. In any event, Muffinz0rz intends to put his dysfunctional, pathological peuplade in charge of pooh-poohing the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of an illiberal coterie of plagiarism. We should not stand for that, with that, or by that. Rather, we should make it clear that by allowing Muffinz0rz to lure the featherbrained into his club we are selling our souls for dross. Instead, we should be striving to seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by his refrains might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational.

Strange, isn't it, how the most polyloquent cacafuegos you'll ever see are always the first to promote intolerance and paranoia? There are two flaws with Muffinz0rz's criticisms: 1) Muffinz0rz's behavior is completely out of line, and 2) I often see sullen leguleians subjecting human beings to indignities. Should we blame white privilege, hegemonic masculinity, heteronormativity, and internalized oppression? No, we should blame Muffinz0rz because we need to make a manful effort to step back and consider the problem of Muffinz0rz's modes of thought in the larger picture of popular culture imagery. A halfhearted attempt simply won't do. He has two imperatives. The first is to compose paeans to presenteeism. The second imperative is to deprive people of dignity and autonomy.

Daily, the truth is being impressed upon us that Muffinz0rz's thesis is that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. That's thoroughly illiterate, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Muffinz0rz conducts himself in a superciliously pompous manner. (Yes, it appears that, for Muffinz0rz, open-mindedness isn't a policy or a belief, but a flag to wave when he feels like it, and one to hide when it doesn't suit his purposes, but that's a different story.) As I conclude this letter, let me remind you that my goal in writing it was not only to rise to the challenge of thwarting Muffinz0rz's pestiferous plans. I sought also to use this letter as a means to reveal the nature and activity of his confreres and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims Mareanie