LogFAQs > #903407543

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do you support breaking up California?
Zeus 06/16/18 10:35:18 PM #79:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Zeus posted... It is a representation. However, because the representation doesn't get you the result you want, you want to change the rules. You guys are the ones who rigged the elections to no longer represent all people equally. No longer? lolwut? These are the rules from the beginning. There was never a direct national vote, you always had electors. The biggest change is how the vice president is decided since it used to just go to the runner-up, but that was changed back when Jefferson -- the THIRD president -- was in office. As for "you guys," I've never held political office, let alone held it in the late 1700s/early 1800s when these things were put together. Kyuubi4269 posted... Zeus posted... It's supposed to balance influence, not perfectly represent the proportions. If it did perfectly represent the proportions then there wouldn't be balance. Sounds like communism to me. You want equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. Just jamming words together and hoping to make a coherent sentence? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:903407543] in Do you sup... [t:76714113]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>It is a representation. However, because the representation doesn't get you the result you want, you want to change the rules. </quote> You guys are the ones who rigged the elections to no longer represent all people equally.</quote> No longer? lolwut? These are the rules from the beginning. There was never a direct national vote, you always had electors. The biggest change is how the vice president is decided since it used to just go to the runner-up, but that was changed back when Jefferson -- the THIRD president -- was in office. As for "you guys," I've never held political office, let alone held it in the late 1700s/early 1800s when these things were put together. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>It's supposed to balance influence, not perfectly represent the proportions. If it did perfectly represent the proportions then there wouldn't be balance.</quote> Sounds like communism to me. You want equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity.</quote> Just jamming words together and hoping to make a coherent sentence? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1