LogFAQs > #903709727

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	New research shows a vast majority of cis people won't date trans people
LockeMonster 06/21/18 4:28:57 PM #145:	gunplagirl posted... LockeMonster posted... gunplagirl posted... Okay. Now read what you wrote, and then realize you're not actually disproving anything I said but instead are arguing "oh, 2 million and 4 million people are totally different" when the entire point of this little roundabout was to not ignore groups in the population when trying to make some universal 100% catch all claim. Which you did and still are. I got your point, I was also trying to correct you since you're wrong. Even 1% vs 2% of the population is 70 million fucking people. You were touting wrong numbers and I corrected you after I asked for you to show me sources to these "well documented" numbers. I don't have enough O characters in this post so I'll have to use scientific notation Wh o^4224563336789985446722 sh Look, if you want to make a point, be an adult and be clear about it. Nothing I've said is wrong. There's also nothing wrong in correcting someone if they have incorrect numbers. I understand what your overall point is but you kept saying they're equal when they're not. --- "Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids." FC: 3282-3258-0224 <cite>LockeMonster posted [p:903709727] in New resear... [t:76736840]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LockeMonster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>Okay. Now read what you wrote, and then realize you're not actually disproving anything I said but instead are arguing "oh, 2 million and 4 million people are totally different" when the entire point of this little roundabout was to not ignore groups in the population when trying to make some universal 100% catch all claim. Which you did and still are.</quote> I got your point, I was also trying to correct you since you're wrong. Even 1% vs 2% of the population is 70 million fucking people. You were touting wrong numbers and I corrected you after I asked for you to show me sources to these "well documented" numbers.</quote> I don't have enough O characters in this post so I'll have to use scientific notation Wh o^4224563336789985446722 sh</quote> Look, if you want to make a point, be an adult and be clear about it. Nothing I've said is wrong. There's also nothing wrong in correcting someone if they have incorrect numbers. I understand what your overall point is but you kept saying they're equal when they're not. --- "Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids." FC: 3282-3258-0224</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1