LogFAQs > #904056139

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Supreme Court deals blow to public sector unions, rules against mandatory fees
frozenshock 06/27/18 11:26:06 AM #14:	KamenRiderBlade posted... Or the Employer can have separate employment contract conditions & terms for Union Members & Non-Union Members. It's not that simple. Unions represent "blocks" of workers that have to be clearly defined, even if not all the workers in that "block" are members. A union might, for example, represent "all the salespeople in the clothing section" or something. --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:904056139] in Supreme Co... [t:76755102]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote>Or the Employer can have separate employment contract conditions & terms for Union Members & Non-Union Members.</quote> It's not that simple. Unions represent "blocks" of workers that have to be clearly defined, even if not all the workers in that "block" are members. A union might, for example, represent "all the salespeople in the clothing section" or something. --- I don't hate people, people hate me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1