LogFAQs > #904066276

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Kennedy to retire from Supreme Court
ThePrinceFish 06/27/18 2:17:28 PM #21:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Balrog0 posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Are they even able to? are you seriously asking after what happened with Merrick Garland? I'm asking if they have the numbers . . . didn't Mitch change the senate rules on appointments or was that only for federal appointments? It's not like they were able to stop his last appointment. Harry Reid changed the senate rules on voting for federal appointments. Mitch McConnell expanded that to the Supreme Court as a nice middle finger to Harry Reid. --- Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that." <cite>ThePrinceFish posted [p:904066276] in Kennedy to... [t:76755582]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote>Are they even able to? </quote> are you seriously asking after what happened with Merrick Garland?</quote> I'm asking if they have the numbers . . . didn't Mitch change the senate rules on appointments or was that only for federal appointments? It's not like they were able to stop his last appointment.</quote> Harry Reid changed the senate rules on voting for federal appointments. Mitch McConnell expanded that to the Supreme Court as a nice middle finger to Harry Reid. --- Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1