LogFAQs > #904140317

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The indisputable pro-choice argument
ChainedRedone 06/28/18 4:40:11 PM #39:	Sephiroth1288 posted... ChainedRedone posted... It does not matter if a fetus is a person. Irrelevant to the argument. The simple argument is that you cannot force a human to give bodily resources to another. So parents should be able to kill their kids then? Like, my sister has a toddler and has to devote TONS of bodily resources to him. She loses sleep, she carries him around everywhere, buys food and toys for him...so she should be allowed to murder him if she decides she doesn't want to do any of that after all, right? She doesn't have to, actually. That's what foster care is for. --- David Mink. Hero. https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6043/6337878059_009dd4c4f3_z.jpg <cite>ChainedRedone posted [p:904140317] in The indisp... [t:76758979]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote>It does not matter if a fetus is a person. Irrelevant to the argument. The simple argument is that you cannot force a human to give bodily resources to another.</quote> So parents should be able to kill their kids then? Like, my sister has a toddler and has to devote TONS of bodily resources to him. She loses sleep, she carries him around everywhere, buys food and toys for him...so she should be allowed to murder him if she decides she doesn't want to do any of that after all, right?</quote> She doesn't have to, actually. That's what foster care is for. --- David Mink. Hero. https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6043/6337878059_009dd4c4f3_z.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1