LogFAQs > #904140613

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The indisputable pro-choice argument
Sephiroth1288 06/28/18 4:45:45 PM #46:	prince_leo posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... Hold up, that would require having other people being forced to give resources to her child. I thought you couldn't do that! Other people who make the decision to adopt the child / go into social work. Unless you're talking about the state / taxes, but that's not really relevant to most people who are pro-choice. But that choice necessitates there being people willing to take your kid in Just as a hypothetical, let's say there were no option to send a kid into foster care. Would you then say it would be ok to kill your infant if you decided you didn't want to take care of it anymore? --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:904140613] in The indisp... [t:76758979]...</cite> <quote><cite>prince_leo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote>Hold up, that would require having other people being forced to give resources to her child. I thought you couldn't do that! </quote> Other people who make the decision to adopt the child / go into social work. Unless you're talking about the state / taxes, but that's not really relevant to most people who are pro-choice.</quote> But that choice necessitates there being people willing to take your kid in Just as a hypothetical, let's say there were no option to send a kid into foster care. Would you then say it would be ok to kill your infant if you decided you didn't want to take care of it anymore? --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1