LogFAQs > #904140885

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThe indisputable pro-choice argument
ChainedRedone
06/28/18 4:50:36 PM
#51:


Sephiroth1288 posted...
prince_leo posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Hold up, that would require having other people being forced to give resources to her child. I thought you couldn't do that!

Other people who make the decision to adopt the child / go into social work.
Unless you're talking about the state / taxes, but that's not really relevant to most people who are pro-choice.

But that choice necessitates there being people willing to take your kid in

Just as a hypothetical, let's say there were no option to send a kid into foster care. Would you then say it would be ok to kill your infant if you decided you didn't want to take care of it anymore?


Or what if humans laid eggs? What abortion be okay then? We're working with reality. The entire point of foster care is because the state realizes they cannot force a human to care for their child (as I have been saying since the OP). Sometimes they're even incapable. That's the entire reason for it's existence.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1