LogFAQs > #904187333

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why do gun nuts dismiss every person who doesn't know intricate nuances on
AlephZero 06/29/18 12:14:46 PM #22:	ChainedRedone posted... darkjedilink posted... ChainedRedone posted... Asherlee10 posted... ChainedRedone posted... Asherlee10 posted... While you are showing a caricature of a person, there are merits to be knowledgeable about firearms and discussing policy changes. Knowing the intricacies of firearms will make a difference in deciding what policies and laws should change. With that in mind, there are some aspects of regulation and gun control that do not require firearm knowledge to talk about, but most do. Rarely. Give examples. Rarely what? Give examples of what? Rarely are the details important. Give examples of contemporary gun control discussions that would require such knowledge. Assault weapons don't exist, for one. It's a made-up term to scare people into giving up their Second Amendment rights. I suppose assault weapons are the only ones that can be argued. But I see people act this way over things such as general gun (semiauto) bans and gun control in general. almost like there was a supreme court case that ruled blanket bans on semiauto firearms are unconstitutional, something one might know if they were somewhat knowledgeable on firearms and the laws surrounding them --- "There is value in segregation." - qwertyman2002 01001100 01010101 01000101 00100000 00110100 00110000 00110010 <cite>AlephZero posted [p:904187333] in Why do gun... [t:76761687]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>While you are showing a caricature of a person, there are merits to be knowledgeable about firearms and discussing policy changes. Knowing the intricacies of firearms will make a difference in deciding what policies and laws should change. With that in mind, there are some aspects of regulation and gun control that do not require firearm knowledge to talk about, but most do.</quote> Rarely. Give examples.</quote> Rarely what? Give examples of what?</quote> Rarely are the details important. Give examples of contemporary gun control discussions that would require such knowledge.</quote> Assault weapons don't exist, for one. It's a made-up term to scare people into giving up their Second Amendment rights.</quote> I suppose assault weapons are the only ones that can be argued. But I see people act this way over things such as general gun (semiauto) bans and gun control in general.</quote> almost like there was a supreme court case that ruled blanket bans on semiauto firearms are unconstitutional, something one might know if they were somewhat knowledgeable on firearms and the laws surrounding them --- "There is value in segregation." - qwertyman2002 01001100 01010101 01000101 00100000 00110100 00110000 00110010</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1