LogFAQs > #904187362

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why do gun nuts dismiss every person who doesn't know intricate nuances on
FLUFFYGERM 06/29/18 12:15:17 PM #24:	Crazyman93 posted... ChainedRedone posted... Asherlee10 posted... While you are showing a caricature of a person, there are merits to be knowledgeable about firearms and discussing policy changes. Knowing the intricacies of firearms will make a difference in deciding what policies and laws should change. With that in mind, there are some aspects of regulation and gun control that do not require firearm knowledge to talk about, but most do. Rarely. Give examples. Oregon's courts threw out a propossed firearm ban because of bad terminology recently. Namely, they decreed "assault weapon" and "high capacity magazine" are NOT clear terms. Which anyone with even a little firearms knowledge knew already. They're not intended to be clear terms. They're intended to be blanket terms because these people want to ban all guns. They don't actually want "common-sense laws." They want a full-out ban, so they try to group as many things as possible under weird and nonsensical terminology like "assault weapon" --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:904187362] in Why do gun... [t:76761687]...</cite> <quote><cite>Crazyman93 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>While you are showing a caricature of a person, there are merits to be knowledgeable about firearms and discussing policy changes. Knowing the intricacies of firearms will make a difference in deciding what policies and laws should change. With that in mind, there are some aspects of regulation and gun control that do not require firearm knowledge to talk about, but most do.</quote> Rarely. Give examples.</quote> Oregon's courts threw out a propossed firearm ban because of bad terminology recently. Namely, they decreed "assault weapon" and "high capacity magazine" are NOT clear terms. Which anyone with even a little firearms knowledge knew already.</quote> They're not intended to be clear terms. They're intended to be blanket terms because these people want to ban all guns. They don't actually want "common-sense laws." They want a full-out ban, so they try to group as many things as possible under weird and nonsensical terminology like "assault weapon" --- Do good. Eat communists.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1