LogFAQs > #904367099

nicklebro posted...

COVxy posted...

nicklebro posted...

And idk why you think you're qualified to determine if someone's philosophy is shitty, but you're clearly not.

I was referring to his heavy reliance of Jung when talking about "psychology".

You consider any mention of Jung to be "heavily relying on" because your incredibly insufficient understanding of philosophy has led you to believe that any amount of Jung is too much. Peterson has repeatedly said that he takes bits and pieces from people, obviously a far more intelligent method than yours which suggests that if you utilize anything someone has said, that means you agree with everything that person has ever said.

you are really wasting your time with COVxy. His gimmick is to obfuscate every discussion and to twist what people say and why they say it. You're better off just ignoring his commentary.
---

Do good.
Eat communists.