LogFAQs > #904368242

COVxy posted...

nicklebro posted...

I can't, what's your point? Why do you always feel the need to manufacture arguments to refute rather than pointing to something he's actually said and refute that?

Show me where Peterson said that he's relying on jungian experiments. If you can't then your argument is irrelevant.

The point is that Jungian "psychology" isn't evidence based, and therefore isn't actually representative of psychology. If you think this is untrue, then show me some experiments that support Jungian psychological views.

So you can't connect this strawman to anything Peterson has actually said? Well I guess your argument has been refuted yet again. Until you bring up Peterson's actual words, there's no reason to humor you any further.
---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.