LogFAQs > #904667457

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	World Cup Discussion Topic 5
Emeraldegg 07/07/18 6:42:35 PM #207:	jcgamer107 posted... Yeah but what's the alternative?? Golden goal is exciting and can reduce the time the players have to spend continuing to play, but what if no one scores? Play forever?? Yes, they should. Just give them an extra sub for every extra period they play. More if you have to. Each team has more than 10 extra players they can choose from. How it's settled now is like if they shot free throws to decide the end of an NBA game, or kicked field goals to decide the end of an NFL game. It's just not fair to decide a game based on one singular aspect of that game. --- I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss <cite>Emeraldegg posted [p:904667457] in World Cup ... [t:76783008]...</cite> <quote><cite>jcgamer107 posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah but what's the alternative?? Golden goal is exciting and can reduce the time the players have to spend continuing to play, but what if no one scores? Play forever??</quote> Yes, they should. Just give them an extra sub for every extra period they play. More if you have to. Each team has more than 10 extra players they can choose from. How it's settled now is like if they shot free throws to decide the end of an NBA game, or kicked field goals to decide the end of an NFL game. It's just not fair to decide a game based on one singular aspect of that game. --- I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1