LogFAQs > #904895893

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWould you rather be 5'5" or 7'5"?
SpinKirby
07/11/18 3:34:34 PM
#51:


Conflict posted...
SpinKirby posted...
From your article.

1. Keep perspective. Height studies tend to be small. Its difficult to get a large group of people who are 610 together to study these things, says Michael A. Rosenberg, M.D., of the Harvard Medical School. For every Dawkins and Malone and Wilt, theres a 6-foot-9 Bill Russell, whos 81 now.

2. Be skeptical. For every study that connects height and early death, you can find one that concludes the opposite. A 2014 study, for example, found that taller people have a 20 to 25 percent lower risk of sudden cardiac death, the disorder that too often takes youth athletes out.


Now try reading the other points listed and everything else I said.

Do you know what trends and tendencies are?


You mean the same trends and tendencies in the one I linked?
Both of them cited inaccuracies due to the lack of data.
It's like you're not even trying. What's your argument?
You know what mine is? "Being extremely tall is definitively affects your health and lifestyle, but not so much that I wouldn't take advantage of solid chance of being an NBA player."

Again, your argument is that extremely tall people simply drop dead in their middle ages.

Or perhaps we can break this down even further.
We can go through your "article" first and discuss every bit of research.
Then we can do the same for mine and see what happens. It seems your incapable of doing that on your own. That's no big deal. I used to read a metric fuck ton of research articles as part of my job, so interpretation is no issue for me.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1