LogFAQs > #905432537

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJames Gunn has been fired from Guardians of the Galaxy after controversial tweet
gunplagirl
07/20/18 5:04:16 PM
#174:


NibeIungsnarf posted...
gunplagirl posted...
You CAN make rape jokes, you can drink and drive, you can cannibalize your loved ones. You probably shouldn't do any of the above though, and you'll have only yourself to blame when your actions come back to haunt you.

Only a horrible fucking human being would compare jokes to either of those (illegal and murderous) things. Good thing you're not being serious.

gunplagirl posted...
And "I get jokes offend you" seems an awful lot like you're implying I don't 'get' the humor. It's tacitly implied that I don't "get" the humor of rape jokes.

I don't see how this implies that at all, but I don't live in your weirdass brain space.

gunplagirl posted...
And it doesn't matter when he made the jokes, he didn't bother scrubbing them and it generated bad press for his employer. *shrugs* your paradigms seem a bit incompatible at times.

This is nonsense. His employer accepted that that past existed when they hired him.


Oh I'm quite serious, you can draw a parallel without having to make it a direct 1:1 comparison. It's actually hilarious you'd say I'm not being serious when you're the one angry he got fired but also think it's acceptable he said those things.

What you said earlier in the quote block is that I am offended by rape jokes. Go back and read what you said. It implied I don't get the humor.

And that's a bull shit excuse. They knew some of what he had said before was offensive but here's the thing, they still could punish him for what they knew upon further inspection. And the fact that it came up AND generated backlash for Disney AND showed that they had hired a person they would never have had they known the extent of his offensive nature? Fuck him, he deserves to be dropped as he never deserved to be hired.

Now then it says via google that guardians 1 released in 2014, but teasers and filming would have started by late 2012, meaning he was on board by then. That's a fuck of a lot different than "stuff from a decade ago" with respect to that point in time. It would have been 5 years and much more recent. What's your limit, what's too long to hold somebody accountable for their actions? 1 year? 3? 5?
---
Pew pew!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1