LogFAQs > #905441361

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Who should be the Democrat candidate in 2020?
Zeus 07/20/18 7:59:34 PM #68:	Moonjay posted... Right now I think it would be extremely foolish for the Democrats to put anything but a white man against Trump. Now is not the time for pushing equality. Now is the time to give people the least amount of reasons to dislike the candidate. Ugly but realistic. I'm not sure they're that smart though. ...literally has nothing to do with race or gender. That's a poor excuse for a candidate's loss which glosses over real issues. BlackScythe0 posted... Definitely, especially if Hillary decides to sabotage the country again. While I lol'd, Hillary wasn't really the problem. Even if Bernie had gotten the nomination (which he never would have; many of the shenanigans complaints were overblown and, in other cases, didn't directly tie to the DNC -- such as Donna Brazile feeding the Hillary camp debate questions then, humorously enough, afterward claiming that the DNC had tried to sway the primary in Hillary's favor), he likely would have lost as well. KStateKing17 posted... Trump has had these same issues and allegations so it might just cancel out with this subject. The difference is that the allegations surrounding Trump don't have him on camera actually doing the things he's been accused of >_> TheCyborgNinja posted... Bernie is the best. Most of his "fringe" ideas that the Libertarians get hate boners for will not actually happen. He will be FDR 2 and right the ship a bit. So he'll have an incestuous affair with his cousin, secretly develop hot-button WMDs, and set up entitlement programs we'll be be paying for centuries to come? =p (And, of course, have history smile on him largely because a world war made American manufacturing relevant.) --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:905441361] in Who should... [t:76823398]...</cite> <quote><cite>Moonjay posted...</cite> <quote>Right now I think it would be extremely foolish for the Democrats to put anything but a white man against Trump. Now is not the time for pushing equality. Now is the time to give people the least amount of reasons to dislike the candidate. Ugly but realistic. I'm not sure they're that smart though.</quote> ...literally has nothing to do with race or gender. That's a poor excuse for a candidate's loss which glosses over real issues. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Definitely, especially if Hillary decides to sabotage the country again. </quote> While I lol'd, Hillary wasn't really the problem. Even if Bernie had gotten the nomination (which he never would have; many of the shenanigans complaints were overblown and, in other cases, didn't directly tie to the DNC -- such as Donna Brazile feeding the Hillary camp debate questions then, humorously enough, afterward claiming that the DNC had tried to sway the primary in Hillary's favor), he likely would have lost as well. <cite>KStateKing17 posted...</cite> <quote>Trump has had these same issues and allegations so it might just cancel out with this subject.</quote> The difference is that the allegations surrounding Trump don't have him on camera actually doing the things he's been accused of >_> <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>Bernie is the best. Most of his "fringe" ideas that the Libertarians get hate boners for will not actually happen. He will be FDR 2 and right the ship a bit.</quote> So he'll have an incestuous affair with his cousin, secretly develop hot-button WMDs, and set up entitlement programs we'll be be paying for centuries to come? =p (And, of course, have history smile on him largely because a world war made American manufacturing relevant.) --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1