And rigorous adherence to prior casting considerations is required because...?
How is it a "casting consideration"?
The priest is literally a male and referred to by the customary title of "Father"?
The showrunners had to consciously alter the text, changing the title to Mother, in complete disregard of anything Shakespeare would have ever contemplated, and in complete infidelity to both the text and its historical context.
And...? I fail to see how that's of any consequence. The showrunners can do what they will since it's their production. I would also think that the themes in a play are of greater importance than adherence to details that do nothing for said themes.
No one is disputing that the showrunners can run a shitty show if they so desire.
The point is that liberals assume that by being "inclusive" they are making room for everyone. However, this belief will always be insincere. They are merely making room for the right kind of people.
They make this clear time and again when they constantly denigrate orthodox Christians and their cultural heritage, which they do so many ways. Calls for inclusion are thus just a convenient cover for their divisive practices.
Or, maybe the gal was better than the guys who auditioned.
That's, of course, under the very questionable assumption that there is any merit to feeling so tragically marginalized in the first place. ---
Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire!