LogFAQs > #905698234

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	My friend told a woman, "fuck her and her ugly ass children."
darkknight109 07/25/18 1:04:55 PM #184:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Nah mate. I made claims to assert how undivulged information could sway either way and thus the unsubstantiated claims of your side are invalid. You had the burden of proof and so in lieu of your side offering proof, I offered an equally invalid unsubstantiated claim with no proof pointing in the opposite direction. Except, again, two claims of "something did happen" and "something didn't happen" aren't equally valid. TC said his friend was tossed out, not the family that the friend was harassing. In that case, you claiming that the family was probably thrown out as well means that the burden of proof lies with you that it happened; since you have none, the default assumption is that the family remained. If I were to claim that the friend got in a fist fight with the family and you claimed that didn't happen, those two claims would not be equally valid, despite the fact that the OP does not mention whether a fist fight did or did not happen. It would be up to me to prove that a fist-fight happened, which I would be unable to do, so the default assumption is that no physical altercation took place. This really should not be that hard to comprehend. Kyuubi4269 posted... Also factual, had she not spoken, he would not have responded. Had he not sworn in front of a bunch of kids, she would not have spoken in the first place. Seriously, follow your lines of logic to their conclusion. Revelation34 posted... Nice try trying to weasel out of that one. Kind of like you've suddenly dropped your earlier claim that I was the first one to bring up whether or not getting angry over pain was justified right after I pointed out the exact post where you raised it as a point of discussion? Speaking of which... Revelation34 posted... There's nothing wrong with swearing in pain. a) Yes there is, if you're doing it in front of kids b) There's also nothing wrong with politely asking someone not to swear in front of children --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:905698234] in My friend ... [t:76821379]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Nah mate. I made claims to assert how undivulged information could sway either way and thus the unsubstantiated claims of your side are invalid. You had the burden of proof and so in lieu of your side offering proof, I offered an equally invalid unsubstantiated claim with no proof pointing in the opposite direction. </quote> Except, again, two claims of "something did happen" and "something didn't happen" aren't equally valid. TC said his friend was tossed out, not the family that the friend was harassing. In that case, you claiming that the family was probably thrown out as well means that the burden of proof lies with you that it happened; since you have none, the default assumption is that the family remained. If I were to claim that the friend got in a fist fight with the family and you claimed that didn't happen, those two claims would not be equally valid, despite the fact that the OP does not mention whether a fist fight did or did not happen. It would be up to me to prove that a fist-fight happened, which I would be unable to do, so the default assumption is that no physical altercation took place. This really should not be that hard to comprehend. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Also factual, had she not spoken, he would not have responded.</quote> Had he not sworn in front of a bunch of kids, she would not have spoken in the first place. Seriously, follow your lines of logic to their conclusion. <cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote>Nice try trying to weasel out of that one. </quote> Kind of like you've suddenly dropped your earlier claim that I was the first one to bring up whether or not getting angry over pain was justified right after I pointed out the exact post where you raised it as a point of discussion? Speaking of which... <cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote>There's nothing wrong with swearing in pain.</quote> a) Yes there is, if you're doing it in front of kids b) There's also nothing wrong with politely asking someone not to swear in front of children --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1