LogFAQs > #905788630

I was more saying I consider them similar because they both take wrestling very seriously and the strength in their promo skills was cutting a believable promo. The content is of course different. The delivery is different. But at their core the reason they cut good promos is because you really feel like they treat wrestling like it's something legitimate and real.

But for me someone who takes wrestling very seriously without having the achievements to back it up to me it hurts their credibility a lot. Like Arn may have talked a lot about how it takes a commitment to be a horseman, but he also always seemed to refer to it in a light where there was some sort of honor and prestige to being one as well. Like he wasn't ever saying "don't be a horseman it's dumb" he was saying "don't be a horseman because you can't handle it"-- but why can't they handle it? What are they doing that's so much more difficult than Meng going in there and fighting dudes. If you're wrestling at a high level then that is self explanatory. If you're just some random four man act that gets a lot of hype but looking realistically is barely holding itself together it becomes a bit harder to sell, and that's where it always fell apart to me.

The words were good but my perception never quite matched up with what he was selling. I always assumed not seeing the earlier stuff was to blame but maybe there's something more to it.
---

No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!