Infect is the word I wanted to use because this is something we can't allow to spread.
And that's laughable. Streaming games is never going to be more than an option for the vast majority of games. From a publisher perspective, digital distribution remains the superior option because it uses less of their bandwidth and computing power. From a consumer perspective, it's only ever going to be at all useful for those with a weaker system, and only then for games with relaxed timing. I'm sure some publisher will try making a streaming-only action game, but that's just not going to work at all and the game will flop too badly to inform anyone else's policy. Don't be so ridiculously paranoid.
DPsx7 posted...
Anyone can make a site with guessed numbers but it's not gonna hold up as proof.
He linked you to Walmart's website, where you could buy that very phone if you wanted to. Those aren't "guessed numbers," that's the price Walmart is charging.
I hope you're right. While the points all make sense I wouldn't put it past the shittier companies (EA, Act, M$) to try anyway.
I didn't see any links to Wally and that's not even what I was referring to. It was the link estimating the price of a land line. They used an average price there and the clown compared it to some low end phone with a set price. I'm sure you see why I'm saying it's not an even comparison.