LogFAQs > #907752407

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Looks like Basic Income failed again, this time in Canada.
Sephiroth1288 08/29/18 12:06:14 PM #159:	Balrog0 posted... They weren't designed to answer that question, which is why 1) the findings are suggestive and not definitive and 2) we should have done this experiment Lol what? If the studies weren't designed to answer those questions then they wouldn't have brought the subjects up. I think you're talking out of your ass. Balrog0 posted... Go ahead and show me some economists who don't think a negative income tax is sustainable. Ok www.forbes.com/sites/marcoannunziata/2018/07/27/ (remove space) universal-basic-income-a-universally-bad-idea/amp/ Want more? --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:907752407] in Looks like... [t:76947176]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>They weren't designed to answer that question, which is why 1) the findings are suggestive and not definitive and 2) we should have done this experiment</quote> Lol what? If the studies weren't designed to answer those questions then they wouldn't have brought the subjects up. I think you're talking out of your ass. <cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>Go ahead and show me some economists who don't think a negative income tax is sustainable.</quote> Ok www.forbes.com/sites/marcoannunziata/2018/07/27/ (remove space) universal-basic-income-a-universally-bad-idea/amp/ Want more? --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1