LogFAQs > #907752700

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicLooks like Basic Income failed again, this time in Canada.
Balrog0
08/29/18 12:12:16 PM
#161:


Sephiroth1288 posted...
Lol what? If the studies weren't designed to answer those questions then they wouldn't have brought the subjects up. I think you're talking out of your ass.


... The income experiment wasn't designed to answer questions about program savings in other areas. It was meant to be used to determine work disincentive effects.

Someone else, years later, used administrative data sets to tie health care utilization to program participants in order to see how their access to health care services compared to non-participants.

However, this method doesn't allow you to track the costs of the services, which are not siloed in the same database. It might be possible in theory to do that, but it would be even harder than the retroactive matching of two or more different administrative data sets

Sephiroth1288 posted...
Ok

www.forbes.com/sites/marcoannunziata/2018/07/27/

(remove space)

universal-basic-income-a-universally-bad-idea/amp/

Want more?


yes, please, preferably something peer-reviewed or at least an academic piece
---
But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1